Comments on: Girard-Perregaux Fly-Back Chronograph “Monte-Carlo http://thewatchlounge.com/girard-perregaux-fly-back-chronograph-%e2%80%9cmonte-carlo/ Tue, 15 May 2012 23:58:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Tom Mulraney http://thewatchlounge.com/girard-perregaux-fly-back-chronograph-%e2%80%9cmonte-carlo/comment-page-1/#comment-68 Tom Mulraney Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:35:34 +0000 http://thewatchlounge.com/?p=12#comment-68 Hi Max, you make a good point but I think that the use of a more precious metal like white gold or platinum may have made the watch too expensive for the target market. Plus it is more of a sports watch than a dress watch and so stainless steel is generally the more common material used for this type of timepiece. What do other people think? Hi Max, you make a good point but I think that the use of a more precious metal like white gold or platinum may have made the watch too expensive for the target market. Plus it is more of a sports watch than a dress watch and so stainless steel is generally the more common material used for this type of timepiece.

What do other people think?

]]> By: Max http://thewatchlounge.com/girard-perregaux-fly-back-chronograph-%e2%80%9cmonte-carlo/comment-page-1/#comment-63 Max Tue, 08 Sep 2009 05:47:01 +0000 http://thewatchlounge.com/?p=12#comment-63 Cool looking watch but I'm a bit surprised they used stainless steel for the case. I would have thought something like white gold would have been more appropriate given its heritage. Cool looking watch but I’m a bit surprised they used stainless steel for the case. I would have thought something like white gold would have been more appropriate given its heritage.

]]>